Sitecore vs Agility

Sitecore vs Agility

Sitecore and Agility both offer headless content management solutions. However, while there is a lot of overlap of features, the total cost of ownership differs considerably.

If you are evaluating other Sitecore alternatives alongside this comparison, see our full breakdown. 

Agility Overview

Agility is a cloud-based headless CMS. Content lives in one place, gets delivered through APIs, and can power any front-end your team builds including websites, mobile apps, kiosks, or any other channel.

Agility offers visual content modeling, a no-code editing interface for marketing teams, REST and GraphQL APIs, native localization, SOC 2 Type II-compliant hosting on Azure with Canadian or US data residency. It also includes an integrated Page Management layer, and an MCP server for AI workflows, while support is available via phone and live chat from our own team, plus a dedicated CSM on select plans.

Sitecore Overview

SitecoreAI is Sitecore's primary platform and the evolution of its XM Cloud product. It is a cloud-native digital experience platform that bundles content management with CDP, Personalize, Search, and Content Hub access under a single license. It runs on Microsoft Azure, includes a visual Pages editor, multi-site support via Site Collections, an MCP layer, and a 99.9% uptime SLA. SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications are also confirmed for the SaaS offering.

Customers currently on or previously considering products such as Experience Manager (XM), or Experience Platform (XP), should note that while some of these versions continue to receive updates, Sitecore's significant feature development is now concentrated in SitecoreAI. Sitecore's long-term direction is to move all customers to SitecoreAI, and this page refers to that platform as Sitecore throughout.

Sitecore does not publish pricing and subscriptions are custom-quoted based on organization size, number of sites, and required modules. Additionally, implementation and ongoing support typically involves a certified Sitecore partner.

Sitecore vs Agility: Which One Fits?

Both are credible platforms but are built for different organizations at different budget levels.

SitecoreAI works well for large enterprises with strong internal engineering resources, existing Sitecore ecosystem investments, and a need for native personalization, CDP, and AI-powered marketing at scale. The platform assumes significant implementation support and ongoing technical capability.

Agility is built for mid-market organizations that seek headless flexibility without the overhead of a large implementation engagement or an ongoing partner relationship. Transparent pricing, direct vendor support, and a no-code editing experience for marketing teams are included in the platform, not added through a partner or a separately purchased plan.

Page Management

Both platforms give editors a visual interface for building pages. However, the difference is in what happens when editors need something new.

Agility's Page Management layer is integrated, so editors work within templates and a module library, building and modifying layouts visually without opening a developer ticket. Developers extend the module library when needed, but routine publishing is editor-driven.

Sitecore's Pages editor offers drag-and-drop authoring through Headless SXA. It is a real improvement over the legacy Experience Editor. However, getting there requires developers to set up rendering hosts, component libraries, and headless configuration before editors can use it productively.

Multi-Site Management

Agility runs multi-site from a single instance. This includes shared content libraries, unified permissions, and one dashboard. Additionally, content written once can be published to multiple sites, and pricing does not change with the number of sites.

Sitecore supports multi-site through Site Collections. While it offers a sound architectural approach, in practice, each site requires a separate rendering host setup and developer configuration. For teams with strong engineering resources, it works well, but for leaner mid-market teams, there can be significant setup overhead.

Pricing

We publish our pricing, allowing enterprises to evaluate tiers and model costs before talking to anyone in sales.

Sitecore does not publish pricing so product subscriptions are custom-quoted and implementation partner costs are additional. For mid-market teams building a business case for a renewal decision, the absence of published pricing is itself a signal about who the platform is built for.

Support

Both platforms require a partner for implementation. However after go-live, the paths diverge.

Our ongoing support is direct and available via phone and live chat from our own team, plus a dedicated CSM on select plans. If something breaks in production, the person you call knows your stack.

Sitecore's base support runs through a ticket portal. Access to a CSM and enhanced response times requires Sitecore360, a separately purchased customer success plan. However, for most Sitecore customers, the implementation partner fills a large portion of the ongoing maintenance gap after launch.